Client Case Study: Estate Planning FirmThey Were Paying, Year After Year,
to Answer Emails They Had Already Answered.
How a US-based estate planning firm replaced a ten-person manual email operation with an AI assistant trained on a decade of its own institutional knowledge — cutting drafting time by 60–70% and freeing the team to focus on clients.
60–70%Drafting Time Saved
20–30 hrsSaved Per Week
3 monthsBuild to go-live
1Sifars engineers
The ClientA Firm Rich in Knowledge, Running on Manual Labour
The firm is an estate planning practice based in California, helping individuals plan what happens to their property after they die. With a team of around 50 and more than a decade of active client work, it had built deep institutional knowledge. Its email operation had not kept pace.
CompanyEstate Planning Firm — name withheld for confidentiality
LocationCalifornia, United States
IndustryEstate Planning / Legal Services
ModelB2C — pending confirmation
Team~50 people

The Problem
Ten People. One Task. No Way to Scale.
Ten members of staff had one purpose: replying to client emails. Around 90 percent of incoming enquiries were variations of questions the firm had already answered hundreds of times — pricing, policy, process. The same questions, in different words, every week.
Email volume was growing with the business. The only available response was hiring more people for the same task. The annual cost had grown into a substantial overhead. And that team was unavailable for anything else.
The SolutionTheir Own Knowledge, Working Without Them
Sifars built an Outlook add-in with one purpose: to let the firm's existing knowledge answer emails, instead of its people. Their entire email archive — more than a decade of correspondence — was indexed into a searchable system the AI draws on with every new email.
Building the knowledge base was harder than expected. The firm's archive arrived as export files totalling over 120 gigabytes in a format only Outlook on Windows could open. Many files also contained voicemails and automated notifications that would have caused the AI to generate inaccurate replies. Sifars filtered and cleaned the data before indexing, and worked through poorly documented library limitations without community support.
Before Sifars:
- cancel10 staff dedicated entirely to email replies
- cancel90% of incoming emails were repetitive variations
- cancelEvery response typed manually, regardless of prior answers
- cancelSubstantial annual cost tied entirely to a single repetitive task
- cancelNo path to scale without hiring more of the same
After Sifars:
- check_circleAI generates 3 reply options per email in seconds
- check_circleReplies grounded in 10+ years of the firm's own correspondence
- check_circleStaff review, edit, and send — no drafting from scratch
- check_circle60–70% reduction in time spent on routine email work
- check_circleTeam redirected from email admin to direct client work
📩 AI Reply Suggestions
Opens alongside any email. One click generates three context-aware reply options, written in the firm's own voice.
✏️ In-Line Proofreading
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation corrected directly in the draft area before anything is sent.
🧠 Institutional Memory Engine
The firm's entire email archive was indexed into a searchable knowledge base. Every suggestion is grounded in answers the firm has actually given before.
🎯 Tone Matching
Replies reflect the firm's established communication style — language the firm would recognise as its own, not generic AI output.
📋 Human Approval Built In
Staff review, edit, and approve every reply before it sends. The AI drafts. The team decides.
⚡ One-Click Workflow
Open email, generate options, edit, send — the entire process happens without leaving Outlook.
The Outcome
The Same Emails. A Fraction of the Time.
Key AchievementA full-team manual email operation replaced by one AI-assisted system — built in three months by a single engineer, trained entirely on the firm's own institutional knowledge.
Since launch, the team reports a 60 to 70 percent reduction in time spent drafting routine responses. What previously occupied several staff members throughout the day now takes minutes. The estimated saving is 20 to 30 hours per week.
More significantly, staff who handled email administration are now focused on clients. The firm has not grown its email headcount. It has removed the need to.
Is This Your Business?If your team carries knowledge that never quite makes it into a process — where the right answer depends on who you ask, not what the system says — and that gap is showing up as cost, time, or people tied to work that should not require them, this is what Sifars solves.
No pitch. No proposal. Just clarity.
Book a Free 30-Minute Session →
Get Started