Client Case Study: ForecastyNobody Moves Half a Million Euros
on a Number They Can't Interrogate.
How forecast.ai turned scattered commodity data into an explainable forecasting platform — and compressed a week of guesswork into a single day of clarity.
1 DayProcurement Decision Cycle
10+Paying Customers at Exit
~18 MoPOC to Acquisition
6Sifars engineers
The ClientA startup solving the most expensive guessing game in industrial procurement
forecast.ai was built to solve a problem that costs industrial businesses millions and rarely appears on a balance sheet: buying commodities at the wrong time. Their customers — mid-sized manufacturers across the DACH region sourcing aluminium, copper, and energy inputs — were making multi-month decisions on insufficient data. Sifars built the platform. It was acquired.
Companyforecast.ai
LocationMannheim, Germany
IndustryCommodity Price Intelligence — B2B SaaS
ModelB2B — mid-sized manufacturers and procurement teams
Team~5 in-house + 6 Sifars engineers

The Problem
The data existed. Nobody had stitched it into something a procurement head could act on.
Commodity prices move without warning. A port disruption, a currency shift, a sentiment change three countries away — any of these can spike the price of aluminium or natural gas overnight. Yet the businesses most exposed were making procurement decisions on gut feel, scattered spreadsheets, and guesswork.
The data existed — scattered, unstructured, impossible to act on without specialists stitching it together. A procurement manager spent a week preparing a single sourcing recommendation. A poorly timed buy cost between 5% and 12% on that spend. For a business running €5M a year through raw materials, that is €250,000 to €600,000 in avoidable cost, year after year.
The SolutionSifars joined at the beginning — and stayed until the market confirmed what worked.
Sifars joined at proof-of-concept stage — a Christmas-deadline build to prove viability and secure funding. Three products were iterated over 18 months before the team landed on Commodity Desk. Each version revealed what procurement teams actually needed before they would trust a forecast with real money.
Before Sifars:
- cancelA week or more to prepare a single procurement recommendation
- cancelData scattered across spreadsheets, raw model files, and external terminals
- cancelNo visibility into what was driving a price move
- cancelForecasts delivered as numbers with no explanation of why
- cancelInventory and buying decisions made on guesswork
After Sifars:
- check_circleProcurement cycle compressed to a single day
- check_circleAll commodity data and forecasts in one unified platform
- check_circleEvery forecast backed by a visible driver breakdown
- check_circleBack-testing available before any real spend moves
- check_circle10+ paying customers at acquisition across the DACH region
📊 Unified Forecast Dashboard
All commodity forecasts and data sources in one view. No assembling information before a decision can start.
🔍 Driver Visibility Layer
Every forecast shows what is driving it — macro indicators, sentiment signals, supply-side factors. The why is always visible alongside the number.
🔄 Back-Testing Engine
Teams validate historical forecast accuracy before committing real spend to forward projections.
📡 Live Market Tracking
Price movements tracked as they happen — not after they have already influenced a decision.
🏢 Multi-Organisation Access
Each customer sees only their commodities and their data. Clean separation, consistent trust.
📱 Mobile Platform
Live forecasts and driver breakdowns accessible anywhere — not just at a desk when a decision cannot wait.
The Outcome
The question changed. From "is this the right data?" to " what do we do with what we're seeing?

"The team stopped spending energy on 'is this the right dataset?' and started spending it on 'what do we actually do with what we're seeing?' That shift — from data wrangling to decision-making — was probably the most tangible change in how the whole operation felt day to day."
— forecast.aiKey AchievementCommodity Desk was acquired — the definitive signal that the platform had market value, not just market fit.
Before Commodity Desk, a procurement manager spent a week gathering inputs, building analysis, and preparing a recommendation. With the platform live, that cycle compressed to a single day. The forecast, the driver breakdown, and the back-test were already on the dashboard.
The bigger shift was in confidence. Teams stopped debating which numbers to trust and started deciding what to do with them. Data trust changed how every sourcing decision got made.
The platform reached 10 or more paying customers across the DACH region and was acquired by its original funder — proof of commercial traction, not just technical delivery.
Is This Your Business?If your business makes decisions on data that lives across different systems — and the gap between having information and acting on it keeps growing — you will recognise this case study. That gap is where significant cost quietly accumulates. Not on a single line. In every slightly wrong call, across every month of the year.
No pitch. No proposal. Just clarity.
Book a Free 30-Minute Session →
Get Started